The Serpens South Cluster

Continuing our series on nearby star forming regions that are interesting and important to the history of astronomy I want to turn this week to one of the most recently-discovered regions, the Serpens South Cluster.

Serpens South is not as famous as some of the other nearby star regions such as Taurus and Ophiuchus, predominantly because it was only discovered in the last decade. The cluster is very faint in the optical part of the spectrum because it is still heavily embedded within its molecular cloud, so it wasn't seen by previous surveys that were predominantly performed in the optical part of the spectrum. Furthermore, because the Serpens and Aquila regions of the Galactic plane appear relatively unpopulated in young stars, astronomers hadn't studied the area in much detail.

The vicinity of the Serpens Molecular Cloud as
seen on inverted Deep Sky Survey plates.  The
presence of the molecular cloud is seen from its
obscuration of background stars (Credit: Eiroa et al. 2008).

The wider region first came to prominence in the 1970s when a dark cloud was discovered in the vicinity of the bright star VV Ser near the Aquila Rift (a dark cloud of gas and dust that extends along the Galactic plane in this area of the sky). The image to the left shows the night sky in the vicinity of the Serpens Molecular Cloud where its presence can be seen by the lower density of stars. The density of stars appears lower towards the molecular cloud because dust in the cloud obscures the starlight from stars behind the cloud.

A number of small bright nebulae were identified in the area at this time, including Sharpless 68 and the Serpens Reflection Nebulosity, both illuminated by nearby bright young stars.

South of this region lies the Westerhout 40 (W40) HII region, a modest cloud of ionised gas thought to be at a distance of 1500 light years (500pc). The HII region is the visible part of a larger star forming region where stars of all masses are currently forming including O and B-type stars, making this one of the nearest regions where O and B stars are in the process of forming.

Map of the dark clouds in Serpens that form part of the Aquila Rift. The main part of the cloud
is shown in the grey rectangular box, which includes the W40 region, the Serpens South Cluster
(the white star), and the HII region Sh2-62. The Galactic Plane can be seen across the bottom-left
corner of the image. The earlier image covers the region around Serpens Main and Serpens
NH3 at the top of the image (Credit: Bontemps et al. 2010).

When this area of the sky was observed by the Spitzer Space telescope in 2006 astronomers discovered a cluster of stars previously unknown, highly embedded within the molecular cloud and visible only to infrared telescopes such as Spitzer. The cluster is very close to the W40 HII region, as can be seen on the map of the region shown above. It was soon dubbed the Serpens South Cluster, and since then it has been the focus of considerable study.

The Serpens South Cluster as seen by the
Spitzer Space Telescope
(Credit: Spitzer/NASA)

The kinematics of the gas associated with the cluster are very similar to the gas surrounding W40, suggesting that the two structures are part of the same star forming complex and are likely at the same distance. A distance of 1500 light years is also in good agreement with that recently obtained from radio parallax measurements.

Early studies, primarily with the Spitzer Space Telescope (see image to the right) uncovered a cluster of about 50 stars, of which at least 35 were still in the process of forming, suggesting that the cluster is very young. Later studies in the far-infrared with ESA's Herschel Observatory detected even more highly embedded sources at even earlier evolutionary stages, providing evidence for even younger protostars still in the process of collapsing to form stars.

Given its youth, the density of the cluster is very high, with at least a few hundred stars per square parsec on the sky. This suggests that either the stars formed in a very dense and clustered state (as we see them now) or that clusters like this can form very quickly out of stars that form in a low density distribution. This is one of the key questions astronomers are trying to answer when they study young star clusters.

The infrared observations have also revealed an intricate network of filaments emanating from the cluster with a hub-like morphology. These filaments are thought to play an important role not just in how stars form and build up their masses, but also in how star clusters grow to their present sizes so quickly. Collisions between filamentary structures in molecular clouds may play a critical role in the formation of such dense clusters.

Studies of young and dense clusters such as Serpens South are important for understanding how young star clusters form and how this is related to the formation of stars within them. It seems that the two processes are critically connected and so to study one we must also study the other!

How do you form a massive black hole binary? (Part 1)

The science news media has been buzzing over the last fortnight after the LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory) team announced the discovery of gravitational waves. The signal appears to have come from the merger of two black holes, each approximately 30 times the mass of our Sun, that were orbiting each other and have since coalesced. Many posts have been devoted to this amazing discovery and its implications, but I'd like to talk about how the binary black hole system might have formed and what it means for our understanding of black holes, starting in this post with how you might form such massive black holes.

Artists impression of the collision of two black holes, as detected by the Laser Interferometric
Gravitational-wave Observatory (Credit: Vox.com)

First, a little background. Black holes broadly come in two varieties: stellar-mass black holes, with a mass a few times that of our Sun, and supermassive black holes, with millions of times the mass of our Sun. The less massive variety are found throughout galaxies, such as the X-ray binary Cygnus X-1, which was the first black hole discovered (see image below), while their more massive cousins are thought to lie at the centres of most large galaxies like our own.

Artist's impression of Cygnus X-1,
a black hole accreting material from its
companion star (Credit: Chandra X-ray Observatory)

How supermassive black holes form isn't really understood at the moment, but fortunately we do have a good idea how stellar mass black holes form. When very massive stars (O- and B-type stars) have exhausted all the nuclear fuel in their cores then they can no longer produce the necessary energy to support the weight of their heavy outer layers. Under the force of gravity the star collapses in on itself, a process known as core collapse. This collapse is incredibly violent and leads to two things, the first being the release of an immense amount of energy (a supernova) and the second is the creation of a very dense remnant such as a neutron star or a black hole.

This process is well understood and there is considerable evidence for it, as well as for the existence of black holes. However, the gravitational wave source that was observed in September wasn't just a black hole, it was two black holes orbiting each other in a binary system, and each black hole was thirty times the mass of our Sun, which is quite large for a typical black hole! So how do you make a black hole this big?

Wolf-Rayet star #124, as imaged by the Hubble
Space Telescope, showing all the material thrown
off by the star as it nears the end of its life
(Credit: HST)

The main factor determining the mass of a black hole is how much material the massive star that it formed from expelled during its life. This material might be expelled by stellar winds during the late stages of its life, such as while the star is a red supergiant or a Wolf-Rayet star (see image to the right), or much of the material might be expelled when the star explodes as a supernova.

The best way to prevent a star from losing most of its mass is to weaken its stellar winds so that they don't expel much material. The strength of a star's winds is usually proportional to the amount of elements like carbon, nitrogen or oxygen (known as metals to astronomers) that the star has. These elements accelerate the loss of material from stellar winds, so their absence would help to reduce the amount of mass lost and therefore increase the mass of the black hole produced.

Scientists have even gone as far as estimating that to produce a black hole as massive as those in the recent binary black hole merger they'd need to form from a massive star with as little as one hundredth the amount of metals that there are in our own Sun. Since the amount of these metals in a typical star has increased over the lifetime of the Universe, you'd need to form these stars very early in the Universe for them to have few enough metals to produce such massive black holes.

However, you could also make such massive black holes by other processes, possibly starting with a smaller black hole and slowly growing it. Material falling into black holes is absorbed by them, increasing their mass, though this is surprisingly hard to do efficiently, so it would be a slow process. Alternatively you could grow a black hole more rapidly by merging it with another black hole, in exactly the same way that the gravitational wave source that was detected was a merger of two black holes.

Whatever the process, the discovery of this merging black hole binary system suggests that black holes as massive as this must be relatively common in the Universe for scientists to have observed such a merging system so easily. Whether the black holes formed with such masses, or if they grew by accretion or mergers we may never know until we are able to detect and study more black holes and better understand the properties of these elusive but amazing objects.

Why are we interested in star clusters?

This blog is all about star clusters, which are pretty stunning and amazing astronomical objects, but some of you might be wondering why astronomers are so interested in them. So in this post I thought I'd give my Top 5 Reasons to Study Star Clusters! I hope you enjoy it!

The Orion Nebula Cluster, seen in X-rays and
optical light. By estimating the masses of the
young stars formed here we can study the
distribution of stellar masses that form
(Credit: Chandra X-ray Observatory)

1. Star formation. Perhaps the most important reason to study star clusters is because we believe the majority of stars form in groups or clusters and so by studying young star clusters we hope to learn something about how stars form. For example, by measuring the masses of all the stars in a cluster we can study the mass distribution of recently-formed stars (known as the initial mass function), which is one of the most important products of the star formation process.

Hubble Space Telescope image of an evaporating
protoplanetary disk (known as a proplyd) in the
Orion Nebula. The disk (dark silhouette in the
centre) is being eroded by radiation from a
nearby bright O-type star leading to the tail of
material stripped off(Credit: NASA/HST)

2. The impact of environment on star formation. Stars form in many different environments, from small groups of only a handful of stars, up to dense clusters with millions of stars and many thousands of luminous and massive OB stars. In dense clusters young stars are very close to each other, which can lead to close encounters that might disrupt binary systems or planetary systems. The bright OB stars that are present in the most massive clusters can also erode the disks around stars in which planets form, potentially hindering the creation of a full solar system like our own. Understanding how the environment that stars form in affects their final properties is therefore very important!

3. Stellar evolution. Just like humans, stars change as they age in many different ways, from subtle changes in their luminosity and slowing their rotation, to dramatic changes as they switch their source of nuclear fuel. To study these changes we need to know how old the stars are, but unfortunately its very difficult to measure how old individual stars are (we can't ask stars how old they are like we do with humans!). If you have a group of stars, however, you can often work out how old the group is by studying which stars have come to the ends of their lives and which haven't. This allows you to estimate the age of the cluster, and therefore all the stars in it. Once you know their ages you can study how the stars have evolved over time, an area of research known as stellar evolution.

The life cycle of a star like our Sun (upper row) and a more massive OB-type star (lower row).
Both types of star form in star forming regions and star clusters, but evolve through different
phases. By studying this process in star clusters with known ages, astronomers can
calculate how long this evolution takes (Image credit: SciOly.org)

4. Star clusters can be used to study star formation in distant galaxies. Its easy to study star formation in our own galaxy, the Milky Way, because we can observe stars forming deep within molecular clouds and the young stars that have recently formed. But in distant galaxies these things are too small and too faint to observe, so our understanding of star formation in other galaxies, whether it is different in any way, and how much star formation has been occurring, is limited. Star clusters however are bright and we can easily observe them in distant galaxies. Its also relatively simple to get a good estimate of their mass, the type of stars in them, and how old they are. This is really useful for astronomers because it means we can study not just the current star formation in these galaxies, but also star formation that occurred in the past. Astronomers call this the star formation history of a galaxy and its useful for understanding how galaxies evolve over cosmic time.

The Antennae Galaxies, two interacting galaxies with a rich and vibrant star formation history.
Astronomers have been able to study its star formation history by observing the many
star clusters (bright blue dots surrounded by red clouds) (Credit: Hubble Space Telescope)

The Jewel box Cluster (NGC 4755), one of many
clusters that are important for measuring distances
in astronomy! (Credit: APOD)

5. Star clusters are an important step on the cosmic distance ladder. In actual fact, they're two steps! The first step is a 'local' step on the cosmic distance ladder, and it comes from a process known as the moving cluster method, which is essentially a perspective effect whereby if you know the direction that all the stars in a cluster are moving you can estimate how far away it is. The second step is a much more 'distant' step on the ladder, which uses the luminosity of globular clusters to estimate the distance of the galaxy that they're in. The method stems from the assumption that the brightness globular cluster in a galaxy usually has the same luminosity as the brightest globular cluster in another galaxy. Based on this, if you can measure how bright the globular clusters in a galaxy are, you can estimate how far away the galaxy is.

There are many other reasons to study star clusters, but these are some of the most important and wide-ranging, spanning the formation of planetary systems to the size of the Universe!

So next time you hear about star clusters or new research into our understanding of these amazing objects, think about all the different scientific topics that might be influenced by those new results!

What are OB associations and why should you care?

Over the last year I've talked a lot about different types of star cluster, but I've also mentioned another type of stellar group known as an OB association, and you may be wondering what are these OB associations? In this post I'm going to talk about OB associations, what they are, and why they're so important for understanding star clusters.

OB associations are very similar to young star clusters in that they are a group of young stars. They're not as compact as star clusters though, and the stars in them are spread out over a larger area of space than for star clusters.

OB associations were first identified just over a century ago by Arthur Eddington who noted the presence of groups of stars distributed across large areas of the sky but sharing a common motion. The actual term OB association was first penned by Victor Ambartsumian in 1947, who noted that these associations appeared to consist mostly of bright and blue stars known as O- and B-type stars. The image below shows the distribution of these stars near the Sun, showing how they appear to fall into a number of rough groups.

The distribution of nearby O-type (filled circles) and B-type
(empty circles) massive stars from Hipparcos. The boxes show the
positions of known OB associations (Credit: Preibisch & Mamajek 2008)

Ambartsumian noted that the low density of the OB associations meant that they weren't gravitationally bound (meaning that they weren't held together by their own gravity - in the same way that dense star clusters are). This means that they must be in the process of expanding and dispersing, and also implies that they must be relatively young structures if we are able to observe them before they have dispersed.

This revelation came at the same time as other scientists were beginning to understand how long stars of different types lived for. This revelation came from understanding the nuclear fusion that gives stars their energy, and then comparing the source of energy that each star has with the rate at which it is radiating that energy away. The O- and B-type stars are amongst the most luminous of all stars (as well as being the most massive), meaning that they are radiating away their energy the fastest and therefore have the shortest lives of all stars. This discovery confirmed the youthfulness of the OB associations that Ambartsumian had hypothesised.

If OB associations are not gravitationally bound then this means that they're probably in the process of expanding and dispersing into the Galactic field. And if OB associations are expanding then this means they were probably smaller and more compact in the past. This has led some astronomers to suggest that OB associations are the expanded remnants of compact star clusters that have been disrupted by some process.

The most common explanation for this disruption is that young star clusters are thought to be held together by the giant gas clouds that they formed in, and when star formation finishes this gas is blown away by powerful winds that come from massive stars. Without this gas the star cluster doesn't have enough mass to hold themselves together by gravity, and so the cluster begins to expand and disintegrate. The schematic below illustrates this sequence of events.

The sequence of events leading to the disruption of a star cluster: (1) The star is born embedded within a cloud, (2) the winds from the young stars disperse the cloud, and (3) without the gravitational potential of the cloud holding the cluster together the star cluster disperses and is briefly visible as an OB association. (Credit: Nick Wright)

There are other suggestions for how star clusters might be disrupted, such as tidal heating of the cluster, or possibly that some of the young star clusters that appear so ubiquitous may not actually be gravitationally bound in the first place and would therefore naturally expand and disperse.

This all means that OB associations are quite important objects to study, because by studying them we can effectively observe the process of star clusters being destroyed. Unfortunately they're not easy objects to study because the stars in an OB association are often spread over a large area of the sky and they can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from the older stars that make up the Milky Way Galaxy. For this reason our knowledge of OB associations, and our census of those that exist in our galaxy is rather slim.

The Scorpius Centaurus association
(Credit: Akira Fujii)

The most well studied OB associations are those nearest to us (this is often the case in astronomy). Associations such as the Scorpius-Centaurus association (see image on the left), the Perseus OB association, and the Lacerta I association were all discovered thanks to the bright and blue O- and B-type stars in them.

Other, slightly more distant OB associations include a number of slightly larger and more populous OB associations in the constellation of Cygnus (some of which I've discussed before here and here), as well as the Orion I association that surround the bright clusters in that constellation. Sometimes OB associations include a number of smaller clumps or clusters of stars within them, for example the double clusters h and chi Persei are part of the larger Perseus OB associations discovered in 1943.

There are a few OB associations that you can see without the aid of a telescope, but not many unfortunately because they are often very diffuse. The Alpha Persei cluster in the constellation Perseus is part of the larger Perseus OB association and is easy to observe. And while you may not be able to see most OB associations there are a number of young clusters you can observe that may one day become OB associations!